Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean ...
In its recent decision in Chiles v. Salazar, the Supreme Court invalidated Colorado’s law prohibiting licensed counselors ...
The Supreme Court just put conversion therapy bans at risk across the country. Here's what a therapist who has worked with ...
Vote on Vallejo St. property would set a dangerous precedent for speculators to destroy rent-controlled housing ...
Experts who work on conversion therapy talked to LGBTQ Nation about just how conversion therapy harms its victims.
Under 1995’s Rosenberger v. University of Virginia, viewpoint discrimination is an “egregious form” of content regulation.
A client struggling with gender identity asks for conversion therapy. You know it is harmful but a court decision seems to ...
The Supreme Court rules against the LGBTQ+ community—again.
In a landmark decision that will impact LGBTQ+ rights in dozens of states, SCOTUS ruled in favor of a Christian therapist.
The Supreme Court Justices said Colorado’s law banning conversion therapy regulates speech based on viewpoint, and the lower ...
Kaley Chiles, a Christian talk therapist in Colorado, argued that the state ban violated her First Amendment rights.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results