A case on turning away asylum seekers hinges on how a single phrase written by Congress decades ago is interpreted.

Readers discuss the effects of billionaires on U.S. society and politics. Also: Electric cars; President Trump’s personal ICE ...

The court’s conservatives appear skeptical of laws allowing mail ballots to arrive after Election Day. A decision could come ...

Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean ...

This week the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that hinges on the meaning of Election Day — and it’s got ...

Justices zero in on a single phrase in federal law as they weigh whether the government can turn migrants away at the border.

President Donald Trump slammed the Supreme Court on Wednesday for striking down his tariff policies, singling out two of the justices he appointed and claiming, “They sicken me.” Trump delivered ...

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cox Communication in a case questioning the extent to which ISPs are responsible for ...

The court found three legal challenges from Maryland cities and one county against oil companies are "far afield" from ...

Alito stood alone in dissent as the Supreme Court ruled supervised release can’t be extended just because a defendant ...

The Third Circuit’s interpretation puts taxpayers in the position of having devastating and unexpected tax bills ...

In Watson v. Republican National Committee the Supreme Court is being asked to decide what federal “election day” statutes ...